Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orzhov Pixie | conor hughes | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Domain Zur Overlords , Esper Pixie , Orzhov Control , Orzhov Lifegain , Orzhov Pixie
Meta Performance Analysis
Fetid Heath ranks #5085 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 99%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 45.6%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Fetid Heath is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 12.33 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.0%. Fetid Heath has a win rate of 61.6%, making it 31.2% better than other 0-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solitude | Creature — Elemental Incarnation | 5 | 71.0% | 1 |
| Dauthi Voidwalker | Creature — Dauthi Rogue | 5 | 71.0% | 1 |
| Fatal Push | Instant | 7 | 67.5% | 1 |
| Reanimate | Sorcery | 5 | 63.5% | 0 |
| Stoneforge Mystic | Creature — Kor Artificer | 5 | 63.0% | 1 |
| Inquisition of Kozilek | Sorcery | 5 | 63.0% | 0 |
| Demonic Tutor | Sorcery | 7 | 61.1% | 0 |
| Esper Sentinel | Artifact Creature — Human Soldier | 5 | 61.0% | 0 |
| Mother of Runes | Creature — Human Cleric | 5 | 60.5% | 0 |
| Thoughtseize | Sorcery | 8 | 58.6% | 0 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Fetid Heath than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fatal Push | Instant | 1 | 5 | 69.2% | 57.8% | +11.5% |
| Solitude | Creature — Elemental Incarnation | 5 | 5 | 68.8% | 58.5% | +10.2% |
| Damn | Sorcery | 2 | 6 | 63.6% | 58.4% | +5.2% |
| Thoughtseize | Sorcery | 1 | 7 | 61.5% | 57.6% | +3.9% |
| Demonic Tutor | Sorcery | 2 | 6 | 60.5% | 57.1% | +3.4% |
| Sol Ring | Artifact | 1 | 6 | 58.1% | 58.8% | -0.7% |
| Arcane Signet | Artifact | 2 | 6 | 58.3% | 59.7% | -1.4% |
| Vindicate | Sorcery | 3 | 5 | 53.1% | 54.7% | -1.6% |
| Swords to Plowshares | Instant | 1 | 8 | 55.0% | 57.6% | -2.6% |
| Blood Artist | Creature — Vampire | 2 | 5 | 55.6% | 58.6% | -3.0% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orzhov Pixie | 12 | 4.8% | 63.1% |
| Esper Pixie | 3 | 0.2% | 58.3% |
| Domain Zur Overlords | 1 | 0.1% | 25.0% |
| Orzhov Control | 1 | 3.9% | 42.9% |
| Orzhov Lifegain | 1 | 1.1% | 0.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.